jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Ok thats cool, that covers the benefit for the peoples who would have been in the west in the counterfactual example. However, it doesn’t cover the generations of those brought over as slaves. What happens if the implicit wage that slaves received was higher than they would have received by staying in the original country? Have the desendents of slaves had some economic benefit from being made into slaves?
If we can figure that out we can work out what the appropriate (in equity terms) compensation should be.
]]>http://delong.typepad.com/delong_economics_only/2007/09/who-benefited-f.html
]]>We have (some) evidence that those left in the country are worse off than they would have been. Now, the people that took the slaves are also assumed to be better off as a result. But are the people who are descended slaves better or worse off as a result of the slavery businesses?
I think this is an important question, as if people that were taken as slaves benefited the most from the slave trade, then in equity terms they should have to provide the most compensation to those left in the other country.
To do that could we compare the economic performance of those who are descended from slaves to the economic performance of an African country that was untouched by the slave trade (the counterfactual). Then also compare states in the US who took slaves to ones that did not, and work out the economic benefit to the Americans who took slaves. If we find the descendants of slaves received the greatest economic benefit, then maybe the burden of compensation should be passed on to them!
I’m not saying that this will be the case, but if it is then isn’t that the logical conclusion?
]]>Kidding. Agreed James.
]]>