jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131I think any argument about framing being about transaction costs flies in the face of a significant body of empirical research so I can see why you’d avoid that one 🙂
]]>Definitely, I 100% agree with that. Which is why the existence of strategic complements is so important – as the utility maximising choice does not necessarily lead to the highest level of utility (given the strategic element).
If that did not exist then there would be no problem, because as you say it is a framing issue (unless we argued that the reference dependence was a result of significant transaction costs instead of cognitive bias – which I’m not going to do).
]]>I agree with you on the unwanted pregnancy front.
However, on the libido front I would also like to add that the benefit to society would have to exceed any loss that occurs from a the strategic complementarity between sexual partners. After all, if introducing the pill for libido creates a game where consuming the pill and having sex are strategic complements between people, then in free market interaction we are going to have a sub-optimal amount of sex. In the case without the stuff in the water we are effectively enforcing compulsory taking of the pill – which may solve this issue.
]]>