Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: The lemon hypothesis vs evidence http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/ The Visible Hand in Economics Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:36:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Matt Nolan http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/#comment-40000 Sun, 07 Oct 2012 10:36:00 +0000 http://tvhe.wordpress.com/?p=639#comment-40000 In reply to sparrow.

They can be hard to spot in this colour scheme, no worries 😉

]]>
By: sparrow http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/#comment-39998 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:19:00 +0000 http://tvhe.wordpress.com/?p=639#comment-39998 I apologize, you did in fact do it. Please ignore the previous post.

]]>
By: sparrow http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/#comment-39997 Fri, 05 Oct 2012 15:18:00 +0000 http://tvhe.wordpress.com/?p=639#comment-39997 You should have the decency to at least put the exact link or title of the original Cowen and other blog posts. It is annoying because you didn’t.

]]>
By: Assets and the market for lemons « The visible hand in economics http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/#comment-1814 Wed, 01 Oct 2008 06:20:56 +0000 http://tvhe.wordpress.com/?p=639#comment-1814 […] Assets and the market for lemons 1 10 2008 I have spent so much time blabbing about asymmetric information without every explaining what I meant. As a result I feel that everyone deserves a little explanation.  Thanks goes out to Akerlof and the lemons hypothesis. […]

]]>
By: Matt Nolan http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/#comment-1813 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:45:34 +0000 http://tvhe.wordpress.com/?p=639#comment-1813 Hi Paul, thanks for commenting.

“While this is true it doesn’t explain the no difference in maintenance expenditures result since under the above assumption low quality cars could still have higher maintenance expenditures.”

Just a sec, when we are discussing quality I take it that we are implicitly talking about the maintenance expenditure – so I implicitly do assume that the higher the maintenance expenditure the lower the quality.

As a result, this empirical evidence suggests that used cars are not lower quality than new cars (I believe they adjust for age in this) and as a result, no market failure is prevalent (which isn’t a conclusive result, but is very convincing).

We could still have a situation where we have asymmetric information and no market failure as long as the sellers reservation value is sufficiently low relative to the buyers willingness to pay for a good of unknown quality.

To show that this isn’t evidence of the lemons argument being flawed I only have to show that the empirical result is consistent with a plausible set of valuations on the behalf of the buyer and seller – I don’t need to show reverse, that the lemons market will uniquely define an eqm where the maintenance costs are the same.

As a result, this evidence indicates that there is no market failure – however, it does not indicate a failure of the lemons model, which is the point I was trying to address in the post.

Has that helped to clarify my point, or do I still sound like I’m talking crack 🙂

]]>
By: Paul Walker http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2008/07/23/the-lemons-hypothesis-vs-evidence/#comment-1812 Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:28:09 +0000 http://tvhe.wordpress.com/?p=639#comment-1812 “In the lemons model the buyer does not know the quality of an individual vehicle. However, they do know the distribution of vehicles in the market. Buyers then base the price they are willing to pay for a vehicle on an expectation of the quality of the vehicle, which depends on this distribution.

Each car type will sell as long as this price is greater than the price the seller would accept. If the sellers of good quality used cars are willing to sell at a sufficiently low price, there is no need for the market failure to occur. As a result, we will have a fully functioning market in “used cars” – however asymmetric information will remain as a defining feature of the market.”

While this is true it doesn’t explain the no difference in maintenance expenditures result since under the above assumption low quality cars could still have higher maintenance expenditures.

]]>