jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131I wonder if the land would still be worth holding 🙂
]]>When studying choices we need to actually think of what people will do, and why, instead of saying that their decisions will just be part of some “chaotic order”. In the case of building there is an information asymmetry between the builder and the purchaser which will cause suboptimal outcomes – thats really the crux of the issue.
]]>Information asymmetry.
Developers know the quality of what they build, improving quality is costly, but the purchaser can’t fully view the quality. As a result, developers reduce the quality of what they build – as someone who spends more to make a good quality place can’t get a sufficiently better price.
The solution to this is education for new home purchasers and some way of making information easier to figure out (eg if rating could be given to a new house based on components).
If consumers knew what they were doing, it would be in the builders interest to make houses that consumers are demanding – leading to the level of quality that the market wants.
However, if there is an externality between properties – then we reach another issue.
“I’m rather skeptical about whether councils are best placed to decide what type of retailing and eateries should go where”
I think that skepticism is fair 🙂
]]>Some of the worst monstrosities in Wellington are the Council’s apartment blocks. They used to be the desired outcomes that were best for the city.
I’m rather skeptical about whether councils are best placed to decide what type of retailing and eateries should go where. Invariably the bad things, such as the CCC was seeking to prevent in the Hendo incident, are things that many people will want to go to.
]]>😀
]]>Still, we should look on the bright side. Houses in Taneatua are more valuable than houses in Detroit. Eh, boy?
]]>Some areas are screwed. Detroit has been dieing for a number of years now – as their car industry has become less and less competitive.
The best thing any government organisation can do is help to buffer the transition between the old and new economy in the region – things still have to change. Ultimately, I don’t know much about Detroit, but I suspect they need to try and work out where there comparative advantage lies and get to it!
]]>