Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: More concerns about limited building activity http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/01/28/more-concerns-about-limited-building-activity/ The Visible Hand in Economics Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:57:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Concert Grand Pianos | concertgrandpianos.net http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/01/28/more-concerns-about-limited-building-activity/#comment-11474 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:57:04 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=2745#comment-11474 […] More concerns about limited building activity | TVHE […]

]]>
By: Concert Grand Pianos | concertgrandpianos.net http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/01/28/more-concerns-about-limited-building-activity/#comment-11473 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 06:57:03 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=2745#comment-11473 […] More concerns about limited building activity | TVHE […]

]]>
By: Matt Nolan http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/01/28/more-concerns-about-limited-building-activity/#comment-11437 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:38:42 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=2745#comment-11437 Hi Jiani and Grant,

With the wealth effect I believe Jiani is correct for the New Zealand economy – given the strong relationship between house prices and New Zealander’s expectations of lifetime wealth (which in turn shows up in the consumption data). That is the primary justification for why “house price falls=bad”. If this was the US then the data would support you Grant, so I completely see where you are coming from.

Now in the post I wasn’t arguing that house price falls and housing affordability were good or bad things – I was just saying that house price falls were required to increase housing affordability. Since the public seems to view one as good and one as bad there is a contridiction methinks.

“Greater housing affordability is only good for first home buyers (and politicians). For existing home buyers the relative affordability between areas is the issue ie when I have to move house can I sell my existing home for enough money to be able to buy (and borrow) in my new location. For investors/landlords the issue is the relationship between rents and market value.”

Very true – housing affordability is primarily as issue for first home buyers. So the relationship with the disposable income of young people an immigrants should be the primary area to look at methinks.

Even so – there is still a trade-off between prices and affordability.

“If, as the DomPost suggests, rental properties are going to be scarce then rents will increase and the return on a now lower value asset will improve. As the returns improve more investors will enter the housing market causing prices and building activity to increase. The permanent structural factors and available builders will then be a key issue.”

True again. It would be interesting to know “how much” these structural issues are holding up prices …

]]>
By: Grant http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/01/28/more-concerns-about-limited-building-activity/#comment-11434 Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:29:11 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=2745#comment-11434 Jiani – I think the link between house value and consumption is pretty tenuous, just because my home is worth more or less doesn’t affect my general consumption except in the specific area of spending on that asset to increase its value. Home value would affect consumption only in terms of how much money can be raised against the asset and most commentators say that we are borrowing too much so a decrease in borrowing should be good.

Greater housing affordability is only good for first home buyers (and politicians). For existing home buyers the relative affordability between areas is the issue ie when I have to move house can I sell my existing home for enough money to be able to buy (and borrow) in my new location. For investors/landlords the issue is the relationship between rents and market value.

If, as the DomPost suggests, rental properties are going to be scarce then rents will increase and the return on a now lower value asset will improve. As the returns improve more investors will enter the housing market causing prices and building activity to increase. The permanent structural factors and available builders will then be a key issue.

]]>
By: Jiani http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/01/28/more-concerns-about-limited-building-activity/#comment-11412 Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:21:55 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=2745#comment-11412 “House price falls = bad” - I think for households who own properties, there is a “wealth effect” here. Falling house prices means shrinking total assets to those households. This is likely to affect their consumptions – how much are they going to spend when they feel they’re not as rich as a few years ago? Take this to a macro level, reduced consumption = not that good, although the amount saved might flow to business investment. If you’re after some justifications for “house price falls = bad”, this might be one of them.

However, house prices falls can be good or bad; but prices falling from elevated level to a more balanced point, better reflecting the relationship between demand and supply, is good.

]]>