<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s all in the name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/03/09/its-all-in-the-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/03/09/its-all-in-the-name/</link>
	<description>The Visible Hand in Economics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 22:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: rauparaha</title>
		<link>http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/03/09/its-all-in-the-name/comment-page-1/#comment-17879</link>
		<dc:creator>rauparaha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:41:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=3121#comment-17879</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-17878&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;@Matt Nolan&lt;/a&gt; 
Thanks for the comment, Matt. I&#039;m not sure that &quot;if we don&#039;t use symbols then we might get awfully confused&quot; is enough to convince me. I think that most disciplines have a fairly standardised language for talking about concepts informally. I agree that there is a language/jargon barrier when talking to people outside the discipline about technical concepts, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="#comment-17878" rel="nofollow">@Matt Nolan</a><br />
Thanks for the comment, Matt. I&#8217;m not sure that &#8220;if we don&#8217;t use symbols then we might get awfully confused&#8221; is enough to convince me. I think that most disciplines have a fairly standardised language for talking about concepts informally. I agree that there is a language/jargon barrier when talking to people outside the discipline about technical concepts, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Nolan</title>
		<link>http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/03/09/its-all-in-the-name/comment-page-1/#comment-17878</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Nolan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 03:36:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=3121#comment-17878</guid>
		<description>&quot;Can a simple renaming of primitives into symbols really help to make me more rational? I’m willing to be convinced&quot;

I would say that we need to take it a step further to state how it &quot;increases rationality&quot;.

By giving primitives identifiable symbols then we can tell when we are actually talking about the same thing using different words.  

By formalising ideas in this way we gain a more tractable framework with which to apply our value judgments and get conclusions - and we are able to flush any logical inconsistencies, or arbitrarily circular logic, out of our framework.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Can a simple renaming of primitives into symbols really help to make me more rational? I’m willing to be convinced&#8221;</p>
<p>I would say that we need to take it a step further to state how it &#8220;increases rationality&#8221;.</p>
<p>By giving primitives identifiable symbols then we can tell when we are actually talking about the same thing using different words.  </p>
<p>By formalising ideas in this way we gain a more tractable framework with which to apply our value judgments and get conclusions &#8211; and we are able to flush any logical inconsistencies, or arbitrarily circular logic, out of our framework.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
