jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131I had the feeling economists practically were engineers 😛
God knows we use exactly the same dynamic programming methods …
]]>Good questions rauparaha.
I would say my problem with economists is that they act like their opinions are strictly the result of objective analysis – when they are the result of value judgments.
Now economists can’t be persuasive and have opinions without value judgments – as you can’t reach a conclusion without introducing some value judgments.
However, I would prefer it if economists didn’t say things like “that is just bad economics” when someone with an equally robust argument disagrees with them. This is where my issue with some economists currently sits.
]]>Engineers could do it all better.
]]>My real question is, how can economists have an opinion AND be persuasive and readable without mixing value judgments in with models?
]]>