jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Indeed. However, if a business isn’t viable over the next 1-2 years, but would be in 5 years there is still the potential for specific capital investment to be wasted – hence why the idea of a strong credit constraint is so important for this.
If there is specific capital, that can’t be brought by anyone not suffering from a credit constraint then letting GM fail might be a mistake – however, I don’t think that these extremely strict conditions really hold in this case 😉
]]>I would suggest a solution where creditors accept a write-down of a proportion of the amount they are owed, and get a proportional number of shares in a new company. The write-down would be sufficient to return the business to viability. Existing GM shareholders get nothing so would never agree to this voluntarily.
]]>