jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Given that Krugman explicitly assumes an infinitely lived individual, just like in perfect Ricardian equivalence, it could not be that 😉
Note here – I am criticising the fact that Krugman was saying his conclusion was so clean cut even when accepting perfect Ricardian equivalence. So it is no use saying that perfect Ricardian equivalence doesn’t hold.
I just wanted to illustrate that it depends how we view “government spending” – and the difference in opinions has more to do with different assumptions about this spending, rather than one side being stupid.
]]>I.e. my horizon is less than infinite yet the payback period is infinite. Similar to the logic that because my student loan is written off when I die I am making absolutly no efort to pay it off
Usual disclaimer that I haven’t read all of your psot or the link (damn job!) so I may be way of track:)
]]>