jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131The example is based on a fixed level of risk, and is independent of the yield curve – as that is merely based on expectations anyways.
The key additional issue is regarding the composition of risk. Now I think even this is a relative small issue.
The main claim I hear is that as the domestic interest rate increases, foreign lenders are willing to invest in more risky domestic assests. However, this “interest rate” they are discussing is the risk free rate – and if the risk free return is rising why would the supplier of credit want to take on more risk for less additional return?
The issue stems from the demand side. If an increase in the OCR mainly convinces low risk borrowers to pull out of the market, the composition of lending becomes more risky.
]]>