jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131I think the comparison to physics is one we have to be careful with – economics and physics are actually surprisingly “inexact sciences”. However, the method – trying to separate “objective” and “subjective” elements – is definitely shared.
Very true. I imagine this is true for everyone in some sense, even economists. Which is why I think that discussing methodology is just as important for us (if not more) then it is for people who are not economists.
]]>It doesn’t matter what ideologies say, the Earth still revolves around the Sun, Newton’s laws of motion are a good approximation and E still equals MC squared.
The problem with economics is that many assumptions and a lot of the data are more subjective than the speed of celestial spheres.
]]>