jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131If there counterfactual was cutting spending on the poor then indeed balancing the budget through progressive tax increases would be redistribution.
I wasn’t aiming at this comment to be solely about the US – I just sort of felt that people were jumping on the “increase tax to reduce income inequality” line without thinking about what to do with the income. I don’t really want to see it thrown into corporate welfare, opps I mean industrial policy.
Add to that the fact that Obama mentioned a whole bunch of industrial policy, and I decided to have the post based on the US 😉
]]>I’m trying to find the paper (I think it’s from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities) on the distributional impact of spending cuts, but it’s pretty much what you’d expect – spending cuts, in general, hit the poor the hardest. In which case, taxing to avoiding budget cuts is progressive.
]]>You are right. It is redistribution – just not necessarily from the rich to the poor 😀
]]>