Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php:6131) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/feed-rss2-comments.php on line 8
Comments on: Clarifying my question on habits http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/ The Visible Hand in Economics Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:10:32 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 By: Matt Nolan http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/#comment-38674 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:10:32 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=7140#comment-38674 In reply to jamesz.

For a smart person.  If we can find one we could suggest it to them.

]]>
By: jamesz http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/#comment-38673 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:40:54 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=7140#comment-38673 In reply to jamesz.

I see a PhD topic…

]]>
By: Matt Nolan http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/#comment-38671 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 02:13:57 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=7140#comment-38671 In reply to jamesz.

I’m merely suggesting that more explicit modeling of habit formation is a good way forward – that would tie together a lot of disparate literature in economics.

Even if we viewed habit strictly as a preference, saying that we should focus strongly at looking at one particular preference that is of great importance is very different to saying “lets model all the preferences”. … it is like admitting that the shift in some curves when we look at a market may in fact be of more consequence than the movements along the curves we focus on.

On that slight side note – this is my current opinion about endogenous money people, they are talking about the importance of some shifts in curves in the credit market, and how to identify them.  If they communicated it in that way, they would find themselves well inside the mainstream.  So I don’t think it hurts us to pick things that are important and focus heavily on them 😉

]]>
By: jamesz http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/#comment-38669 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:32:24 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=7140#comment-38669 In reply to Matt Nolan.

If I understand you correctly you’re saying “Economists should endogenously model preference formation.” Well, yes, that would be nice and there’s probably a Nobel prize waiting for whoever manages to find a convincing way of doing it.

]]>
By: Matt Nolan http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/#comment-38667 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:17:03 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=7140#comment-38667 In reply to jamesz.

“I think you’re drawing a false dichotomy between modelling it as a preference and choosing to form a habit.”

 

I would say that it is a matter of what is done – it is currently modeled as an exogenous process, or the endogenous process that generates it is arbitrary.

Now when we solve models that include habitual behaviour in consumption, our agents solve forward and take this into account – that is cool.  But given that this forms part of what an agent is choosing to do, there is definitely a role to more accurately describing the process of habit formation … as the shape of this process will change the solution that our agents choose.

“I don’t think Lucas was asking macroeconomists to explicitly model preference formation”

No, but the reason it might be nice to have a firmer theory on the process of habit formation is that it allows us to model structural changes in the development of habits.

 

]]>
By: jamesz http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2012/07/06/clarifying-my-question-on-habits/#comment-38665 Fri, 06 Jul 2012 01:03:29 +0000 http://www.tvhe.co.nz/?p=7140#comment-38665
  • If there is an exogenous preference for habitual behaviours then people will endogenously choose to invest in some habits, depending on how much they enjoy that activity. I think you’re drawing a false dichotomy between modelling it as a preference and choosing to form a habit.
  • I don’t think Lucas was asking macroeconomists to explicitly model preference formation 😉
  •  

    ]]>