jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Good point – it is always best to try to give an argument its strongest airing to figure out whether we agree on it or not!
From what I can tell, their current view is based on the fact that there is some type of “financial cycle” above and beyond the economic cycle, and that this needs to be dealt with actively and separately. This is the Borio view:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/freeexchange/2012/12/reforming-macroeconomics
http://www.voxeu.org/article/measuring-potential-output-eye-financial-cycle
Contrary to what he says – his advice appears incredibly ad hoc to me, and I’m very far from convinced.
I also think that if we have the Bank trying to do both active monetary and financial stability policy in this way – they need to be split into two organisations:
http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2010/02/24/seperation-of-monetary-and-financial-stability-issues/
Still, definitely an interesting issue!
]]>As am I!
I guess I was looking for some kind of analogous structure that would explain all of this behaviour beyond the simple explanation of “financial stability”… Hence, the corporate planning analogy.
I look forward to many more musings on this and the other macro tools I am sure! 😉
]]>Even if we were to accept the analogy – the RBNZ is not mandated to determine the “direction of NZ Inc”. That is one of the key points I take issue with here!
If we add in the fact I take serious issue with the NZ Inc analogy in the first place:
http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2013/08/16/thinking-about-aaron-inc/
Then the reason I find it inappropriate is fairly clear 😉
If the government intends to run New Zealand as a corporation, I would be concerned. If an unelected technocratic body decides it wants to have a go at running elements of NZ as a corporation I am very concerned!
]]>That is indeed my concern – adding the fact that it seems to be inadvertent, and that they aren’t democratically elected, it actually smells a bit worse though 🙁
]]>Is that character based on Trotsky? It looks like him, and it sounds like him!
]]>Cheers for the link, I’ll be sure to have a look!
I’m being a little bit cheeky suggesting that I’m stopping discussing macroprudential policy because of this – in truth things are a bit different. I am moving towards a focus on income data and as a result I won’t have the time to keep up with the literature on macroprudential things – so I will be shifting what I write. I am trying to find people to write on macroprudential matters here – so the subject should still be alive, I just wont be the one writing 😉
]]>Sad to hear RBNZ may be heading down this dangerous path. Do you know what other central banks are doing? Have you heard of any dissent or disagreement within RBNZ? From memory they were after feedback on their proposals earlier in the year. I wonder if many people showed concern or of this is something only a few are talking about. If the latter, maybe this should not be your last post Matt.
]]>