jetpack domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131updraftplus domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131avia_framework domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /mnt/stor08-wc1-ord1/694335/916773/www.tvhe.co.nz/web/content/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6131Why is the question of immigration only for the last 25 years? NZ has had immigration for a much longer period?
]]>This is a broad question about the long term level of net-inflows and involves thinking through two concepts:
1) Is immigration good for current residents.
2) How much do we, as a community, value potential future residents.
If we can argue that the first one is positive, there is no need to consider the second question – which is why this is where the debate heads (both in the literature and in your comment).
Now this can be seen as an open question. When NZIER released this (http://nzier.org.nz/publications/migrants-increase-our-incomes-nzier-insight-44) they were specifically noting that a higher population would lead to higher incomes for current residents. Furthermore, I was under the impression that both the literature on migration and agglomeration tended to support this type of view.
There may be some trade-off between income and other lifestyle elements (land per person, population density) but this makes it an open question – and it still leaves the second question of “social responsibility as a global citizen” open.
]]>