John Key: big government conservatism?

Yesterday Nick Smith was thinking of taxing plastic bags. Today John Key threatened legislative intervention in an employment dispute. Now the government’s planning to spend $1.5b on telecommunications infrastructure. Now I’m not necessarily opposed to what they’re doing, but they do seem awfully interventionist for a right wing government.

How do people that voted for limited government and a retreat from the recent years of big government feel about all this? Is John Key living up to his promise to pull back from the days of the government ‘meddling’ in people’s lives?

9 replies
  1. goonix
    goonix says:

    Key quickly shut down Nick Smith’s idea on the plastic bag tax, as linked by Brad Taylor in the comments http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/03/30/nick-smith-is-the-bag-man/#comments

    I never voted for Key directly, although obviously I preferred him to the alternative (which is what democracy really is – picking the lesser of the available evils).

    I would say the National Government has a mixed record so far. There have been some poor ideas, like the jobs summit and resulting cycleway and this sort of Muldoonist ‘think big’ spending. However, I’d say the positives so far outweighs the negative: 90 day probation period, repeal of EFA, more ‘inclusive’ government (e.g. w.r.t Maori), repeal of thermal generation ban, cutting bureaucracy in state sector (especially ‘hug a polar bear’ schemes), tax cuts, open to private prisons. And in general there has been a personal responsibility theme (pies at schools, plastic bags). All in all, I’d give them a decent pass mark. 🙂

  2. StephenR
    StephenR says:

    …they do seem awfully interventionist for a right wing government.

    First you should probably consider what you mean by “right wing”. We knew before the election that they were really just barely centre right, what with all the uptake of Labour policies and promises not sell state assets, so it shouldn’t be a huge surprise.

  3. rauparaha
    rauparaha says:

    @StephenR
    Yeah, I couldn’t think of a term that fit precisely so I went with a generic label and hoped that people would know what I meant 😛

    Perhaps I am just a bit naive in being surprised at their big spending, interventionist ways. As goonix says, there have been things they’ve done which are more right than centre. But headliners like the jobs summit and its resulting projects just seem more Labour-ish than National to me.

  4. Brad Taylor
    Brad Taylor says:

    I’m with StephenR: National ran on a very centrist platform, and investment in telecomms was explicitly part of the campaign. I don’t think many National voters had any illusions of the party being committed to limited government.

  5. StephenR
    StephenR says:

    My guess is that Key is playing a bit of a ‘long game’ – if he can convince voters he’s done a good job or even a very good job around the time of the next election, he may use that political capital to step up the ‘right wing’ policies at (perhaps, it doesn’t really matter) the instigation of the more idealistic members of cabinet. Will be very interesting to see.

  6. Brad Taylor
    Brad Taylor says:

    @StephenR
    I don’t see any evidence to suggest that is the case. Are there any particularly idealistic members of cabinet? Politicians generally need to follow public opinion to stay in office. Public opinion at the moment seems to be getting more interventionist, so I would predict National will drift even further to the left fiscally, at least in the short term.

  7. StephenR
    StephenR says:

    @Brad Taylor

    Evidence-schmevidence! 😀 No evidence, perhaps apart from the fact that the commitment not to sell state assets ends at the next election. The longer anyone spends in office, the more things they want to do, and it just naturally follows (IMHO) that this will lead us to the right. Pollies do need to follow public opinion, but also if public opinion of you is high, you may be able to risk an initiative or two, probably in the 2011 election manifesto, which is more the short-medium term…

    edit: as for idealistic cabinet members, one hears about that sort of thing from far more connected pollie-watchers than myself, but they’re mentioned often enough (if only ‘the right wing’ of the National party) for me to assume they exist! McCully and Smith apparently are, and you could probably add anyone else who is still around from the 90s lot…

  8. Wang
    Wang says:

    SCANDALS! SCANDALS! SCANDALS!

    EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY! EMERGENCY!

    MANY OF THE WORST CASES OF RACIAL PREJUDICE IN WORLD HISTORY!

    PLEASE TELL PRIME MINISTER JOHN KEY IMMEDIATELY!

    (There are thousands of copies of the information below on the Internet in New Zealand.)

    LONG LIVE PRESIDENT BARACK OBAMA!

    Barack Obama is a racial minority and does not like racism.

    WORLDWIDE DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION RELATING TO SCANDALS:

    (I) I do solemnly swear by Almighty God that George W. Bush committed atrocious, racist, hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism which I am not at liberty to mention. Many people know what Bush did. And many people will know what Bush did—even until the end of the world. Bush was absolute evil. Bush is now like a fugitive from justice. In any case, Bush will go down in history in infamy.

    (II) It is opined that Bill Clinton committed terrifying, racist, hate crimes during his presidency, and I am not free to say anything further about it. ‘Be sure your sins will find you out’ (Numbers 32:23).

    (III) What if basically all racial minority people would subscribe to the interpretations that George Herbert Walker Bush committed monstrous, racist, hate crimes while he was the President of the United States? It will eventually come out: it is only a matter of time.

    (IV) I know it may be hard to believe. However, Ronald Wilson Reagan committed horrible, racist, hate crimes during his presidency.

    Respectfully Submitted by Andrew Yu-Jen Wang, J.D. Candidate
    B.S., Summa Cum Laude, 1996
    Messiah College, Grantham, PA
    Lower Merion High School, Ardmore, PA, 1993

    (There are thousands of copies on the Internet in the USA indicating the contents of (I), (II), (III), and (IV). For example, one can go to Google right now, type “George W. Bush committed hate crimes of epic proportions and with the stench of terrorism,” hit “Enter,” and readily find 1,000 or more copies indicating content of (I). For example, one can go to Msn right now, type “It is opined that Bill Clinton committed racist hate crimes, and I am not free to say anything further about it,” hit “Enter,” and readily find more than 590 copies indicating content of (II). For example, one can go to Msn right now, type “George Herbert Walker Bush committed monstrous, racist, hate crimes,” hit “Enter,” and readily find more than 350 copies indicating content of (III). For example, one can go to Msn right now, type “Ronald Wilson Reagan committed horrible, racist, hate crimes during his presidency,” hit “Enter,” and readily find more than 300 copies indicating content of (IV). The contents of (I), (II), (III), and (IV) exist very extensively in all major search engines in the USA and in numerous search engines beyond the USA. There are thousands of copies in numerous countries around the world. For example, there are countless copies on the Internet in Australia, Belgium, Bosnia, Brazil, Bulgaria, Canada, China, Croatia, Denmark, Estonia, France, Georgia, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Korea, Norway, Romania, Russia, Sweden, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Ukraine, etc. Copies in foreign countries are typically written in respective foreign languages through the use of computer programs on the Internet that make such translations possible. Copies in foreign countries indicate that the presidents or prime ministers or kings or heads of state of respective foreign countries are to be informed of the information relating to scandals. The expressions—“SCANDALS!” and “EMERGENCY!”—are used repeatedly at the top of the copies. Please feel free to go to, for example, mooter.com, google.com.au, au.yahoo.com, live.com.au, google.be, google.ca, ca.yahoo.com, baidu.com, sogou.com, google.cn, yahoo.cn, live.com.cn, jubii.dk, google.dk, dk.yahoo.com, google.ee, exalead.fr, ujiko.com (FR), google.fr, fr.yahoo.com, ujiko.com (DE), allesklar.de, de.abacho.com, dino-online.de, google.de, de.yahoo.com, google.it, it.yahoo.com, infoseek.co.jp, goo.ne.jp, google.co.jp, yahoo.co.jp, chol.com, google.co.kr, kr.yahoo.com, google.ro, yandex.ru, rambler.ru, google.ru, ru.yahoo.com, live.com.ru, entireweb.com, google.se, se.yahoo.com, vindex.nl, zoek.nl, google.nl, nl.yahoo.com, puruze.com, uk.abacho.com, ujiko.com (UK), google.co.uk, and uk.yahoo.com; and type relevant search terms, hit “Enter,” and find worldwide results.)

    “BAD NEWS FROM THE UNITED STATES: ON THE RACIST HATE CRIMES AND ETERNAL INFAMIES OF GEORGE W. BUSH, BILL CLINTON, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, AND RONALD REAGAN” BLOG OF ANDREW YU-JEN WANG

    badnewsfromtheunitedstates.blogspot.com
    _______________
    ‘If only there were a BAN against invention that bottled up memories like scent & they never faded & they never got stale.’ (Please feel free to go to baidu.com, type “ban invention that bottled up memories,” and hit “Enter.”)

Comments are closed.