I see that Bloomberg is stating that Economists are changing their minds about unions – moving from seeing them negatively to seeing them positively.
Unions are an interesting topic, but are also inseparable from a discussion about the relative welfare state and competition policy embedded in a nation. Nordic and German trade unions are quite different from the trade unions of the US, UK, and Australiasia – and any evaluation of an institution in this way requires a model that allows us to represent the institution relative to other institutions in the economy, the way individuals behaviour relates to that, and how the outcomes for individuals will vary.
So does anyone want to do some of that in the comments below? I will hopefully be writing up some things on these issues over time – but as a starting point for discussion I will put up this oversimplification. Unions help to correct issues of insufficient bargaining power for labour, but like any monopoly their existence leads to deadweight losses which hurt those outside of the unionised industry, and are unfair to capital owners in competitive markets. Evaluating whether more unionisation is good relies on comparing the costs and benefits given in this oversimplification.
Off we go …