The following article by Roger Kerr discusses New Zealand economic growth relative to the OECD. He complains that our economy is growing too slowly, and as a result we are actually falling further behind other developed countries.
As he is from the Business Round Table, he has to criticise government for this lack of economic growth. There are two ways he could do this that would imply government failure. He could:
- attack government spending and say that it is crowding out productive investment
- attack where government spending is going
In a sense, he chooses to attack where government spending is going in his article, but not directly. What I find interesting is that he complains that productivity growth is too low, and then blames the government for abandoning its goal of economic growth. So he is blaming government for a lack of action, rather than saying that some active government policy was a failure. This implies that he thinks government policy can increase productivity growth.
We also happen to believe that appropriate government policy can improve productivity and economic growth, it is nice to see that people on the right-hand side of the spectrum agree with us.