It appears that the idea of a fixed exchange rate has been risen, again.
Now the suggestion in here does take into account the impossible trinity – so it is theoretically possible. We have:
- Monetary policy can impact on output and inflation,
- The exchange rate is fixed,
- Capital flows ARE LIMITED
That third one is the kicker. Two issues I have here are:
- Limited capital flows implies that interest rates will rise (as for the previous interest rate there is a shortage of capital relative to demand). This implies that our functioning monetary policy that controls inflation must have higher interest rates and lower output.
- Limiting capital flows is pretty difficult for a small open economy like New Zealand.
On the balance of evidence and theory I would say that I strongly disagree with this proposal.
Update: BK Drinkwater comments here. He rightly points out that a less volatile currency isn’t obviously a good thing – it is the movement in export prices and whether they represent actual changes in relative prices that matters.
1 ping
Tweets that mention TVHE » On the fixed exchange rate -- Topsy.com says:
December 2, 2009 at 10:00 am (UTC 12 )
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by bernardchickey, Matt Nolan. Matt Nolan said: Fixed exchange rate, no: http://www.tvhe.co.nz/2009/12/02/on-the-fixed-exchange-rate/ [...]