In defence of government funded tertiary education
As a young child I was told repeatedly that education was a right, and that society should pay for it – not just at the primary level, not just at the secondary level, but at the tertiary level as well. Being an argumentative child I disagreed repeatedly. In I make a point of still disagreeing whenever I run into my mother.
If I was to boil down my argument I’d say “the individual benefits from their education with higher wages and the satisfaction involved”, I would then go on to say that “we should only fund the public benefit associated with education – which is shown to be lower than the current level of funding”. This would lead to the reasonable conclusion that we should be cutting funding to tertiary education, not increasing it.
Now this was all well and good when I was a young impulsive lad, but as I’ve grown older I’ve become unhappy with the idea of reaching conclusions. As a result, I find it a bit uncomfortable that I would find this solution “obvious” – and with a few seconds of thought I’ve realised why.
