Off topic: Wellington Phoenix football club changes ownership

This is a Wellington blog that is written by economists who also really enjoy the football.  As a result, given the recent big news regarding our local football club, I have to say something 😉

Terry has given up the A-league license of the Phoenix given the difficulties he is currently facing – and it has been picked up by a consortium of Wellington businessmen.  These businessmen are all in good financial shape, and have committed to a five year plan for the club (hopefully one that is more successful than the original version of a five year plan 😉 )

There are a few things I’d like us to keep in mind here:

  • This change will increase certainty, and improve the stability of the club – this is great.
  • It is a bit late in the day to expect big things this season – so lets just get behind the team, and enjoy the football, even if we are losing.
  • Terry founded the club and did a hell of a lot of getting football moving in Wellington – and we should recognise that.  If possible recognise it with a comment here.
  • Hopefully games will be more fully advertised, so people will know when they can head along.  I’m hoping to see more of you fine people out there.

Why I’m in a bad mood

Agnitio asked me what has been going on recently, as I was complaining its a mess.  I emailed him my summary, so I thought I’d also put them down here:

The ECB announced that its going to accept some things as collateral – but dump others.  Leaving markets confused about what the hell was going on, and what it means for sovereign debt purchases.

The US followed this up by saying that they would buy a smaller amount of long-term debt than forecast, sell short-term debt, and flatten the yield curve.  They say it will be stimulatory because NK models say so – however, a flat yield curve is a bit dodgy, given that it’s formed by expectations of either weak growth or weak inflation in the future.  In essence NK models say “get the long-run real interest rate down as much as possible” which you do by increasing inflation expectations, not nominal rates – so markets collapsed after that.

US government decided to get involved by refusing to extend the debt limit AGAIN, if they can’t make up by Sep 30 the US will default.

Then the European commission decided that it was a good time to say they were going to introduce a financial transactions tax – just when financial markets are panicking – and for good measure they said they hadn’t figured out what level it would be at, or what would be taxed yet, just to add to uncertainty.

While all this is happening Italy and Greece have continued to say they’ll get their fiscal situation in order – but they keep delaying introducing actual policies.  Given Greece is effectively insolvent, the dithering by them, other European governments, and the ECB, makes it unclear who holds the liability the entire European financial system is at a stand still.  Given the exposure of Australian banks to this, we have seen funding costs rise considerably (luckily no-one in NZ is actually borrowing anything).

With Europe having fluffed around while the crisis has been in full swing over the past 2 months, purchases from China have pulled back, seeing activity there slow as well.  A slowdown in China will have the impact of lowering our export prices.

Party.

This mix of awesome factors has seen the cost of insuring against default in Australian banks increase to within a whisker of their Lehman Brother peaks.  It has seen uncertainty measures push at new highs.

Unlike the Lehman Brother’s collapse there is no reason for these indicators to be high solely based on the financial fundamentals – the debt burden, and who holds what, is known.  However, while policy makers were trying to improve outcomes during the crisis in 2008, they seem more interested in trying to cause a crisis this time around.

The EU needs to get its priorities straight

Seriously.  These guys have been fluffing around for so long that the entire financial system is in a panic.  So they decide its a good time to announce they are going to start taxing financial transactions – but they haven’t decided the level yet or the full scope yet.

Is Europe’s motto, during times of uncertainty add more uncertainty?  This is ridiculous.

If we have another financial crisis here, the blame mainly falls on the politicial systems in Europe (and to a lesser extent the US).  When everything I try to say to people regarding the outlook for the economy is conditional on politicians being sane, its hard to really believe that what I’m saying is damned right.

FYI, I’m against a Tobin tax.  At some point this deserves a fuller post, I have a couple of little guys sitting around here and here and here  though.

Stumbling to another crisis?

 

Operation Twist hasn’t gone down particularly well has it.  It could be that the policy was smaller than expected, it could be that growing political angst has made the idea of further Fed stimulus seem more unlikely, but either way a drop in asset prices and falling inflation expectations isn’t what we want to see following a Fed announcement – especially in the middle of a financial crisis.

I think that the general idea would work, akin to this.  However, for some reason the actual announcement has disappointed markets.

In terms of NZ, our dollar has dropped reasonably sharply following the announcement.  I’m hoping this is because the dollar is seen as an “asset price” and people are just moving out of it because they are less willing to take on risk – given lower than expected accommodation of monetary policy by the Fed. {Update:  In terms of the dollar it seems that comments by Dr Bollard last night also had an impact}

Worst case, the drop in the dollar is a signal of lower export prices.

New Zealand policy makers have done a damned good job the last few years, but its hard for them to do much in the face of incompetence around the world – given that we are a small open economy.

Off Topic: Tricking athletes into performing

Fascinating article on the New York Times about using deception to make cyclists push themselves past what they thought their limits were in training.

It’s a shame I don’t have  coach for my road cycling….I’m not really sure if I will be able to “trick myself”, haha.

Why we need an impartial organisation to cost all the parties policy platforms

FFS, just when it sounded like the Greens were going to come up with sensible policy prescriptions we get this absolute piece of rubbish.

If this is how we base policy why don’t people just make plans as follows:

  1. I will talk with people in important tones during very serious meetings,
  2. I will offer to give them money arbitrarily
  3. Therefore:  I will create jobs, income, sustainability, and cute kittens.

Seriously, in what world does a massive building initiative make sense when we are going to be struggling to rebuild Christchurch during the next decade given capacity.

In what world does giving money to green entrepreneurs (I would call many of these people marketers) provide “65,000 additional jobs”. [Pro-tip:  1% of the global market is HUGE – remember that we are less than 0.1% of the global population – so saying “just”, especially given foreign subsidies and scale, is ridiculous].

In what world do these policies not crowd out other industries – guess what, skilled workers are already in work, you will be just driving up their wages with your arbitrary industrial policy.

Tbh, this rings of policy made by people who just want to win an election, and have very serious meetings with policy analysts and people who make glossy leaflets.  It shows no reality, and no willingness to think about trade-offs.

When the policy is out fully, I’ll do a write up on it without the angst – but right now I’m pissed.  To think I was considering voting for them – god I wish we had a real choice this election …

UpdateKiwiblog and No Right Turn discuss.